CORRUPTION INDEXES OF COALITION 2000
May 2002
CONTENTS
CHIEF PROBLEMS FACED BY BULGARIA
ASSESSMENTS OF THE SPREAD OF CORRUPTION
Sample
National representative survey of the population covering 1170 respondents
aged 18 and over.
Survey method
The survey method used is face-to-face interview.
Field work
Field work was conducted between May 22- 31, 2002.
CHIEF PROBLEMS FACED BY BULGARIA
The trend towards increased public attention to corruption, started at the beginning of last year, marked a sharp drop in May 2002. The nearly 10% decrease, compared to the previous monitored period (January 2002), of respondents citing corruption as the most serious problem facing Bulgaria is an indicator both of the saturation of media space with the subject of “corruption”, and of shifting the problem at the expense of other “illnesses of the transition” such as unemployment, poverty, low living standard, etc. These problems were in turn permanently established as most acute from the very start of the monitoring.
Table 1. Main problems faced by Bulgaria
|
Sept. 1999 |
January 2000 |
April 2000 |
Sept. 2000 |
January 2001 |
October 2001 |
January 2002 |
May 2002 |
|
| Unemployment |
64,6 |
65,3 |
71,3 |
67,8 |
67,5 |
64,0 |
68.9 |
71.5 |
| Low incomes |
50,2 |
50,6 |
48,9 |
49,0 |
46,0 |
45,4 |
32.9 |
45.2 |
| Poverty |
37,1 |
41,2 |
41,9 |
41,5 |
39,4 |
46,9 |
42.7 |
40.3 |
| Corruption |
38,5 |
37,5 |
40,1 |
37,5 |
36,5 |
45,6 |
47.0 |
39.3 |
| Crime |
32,4 |
27,9 |
28,9 |
25,7 |
51,7 |
36,3 |
32.9 |
30.2 |
| Healthcare |
16,0 |
14,6 |
14,1 |
14,0 |
5,1 |
11,9 |
17.2 |
19.9 |
| High prices |
21,9 |
18,9 |
19,4 |
22,4 |
16,3 |
15,7 |
20.9 |
16.8 |
| Political instability |
15,4 |
13,1 |
13,8 |
17,0 |
18,2 |
12,0 |
13.1 |
14.1 |
| Education |
3,8 |
2,9 |
2,3 |
2,1 |
0,8 |
2,6 |
1.8 |
4.4 |
| Environment pollution |
5,0 |
4,3 |
2,4 |
2,7 |
3,0 |
3,3 |
1.5 |
2.2 |
| Ethnic problems |
4,0 |
1,4 |
1,9 |
1,7 |
0,9 |
1,6 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
* Respondents gave up to three answers and the sum total of percentages therefore exceeds 100.
Base N=1170
Acceptability in Principle
This index reflects the level of value acceptability of the different corruption practices.
The decrease in the levels of this index, since September last year, is compensated by their slight increase in January and May this year. The trend illustrates both public sensitivity to the manifestations of corruption, as well as the increasingly more permanent negative public opinion to these acts on a moral and value level.
Figure 1. Acceptability in Principle

Base: N= 1170
Susceptibility to corruption
This index measures the tendency of citizens to make compromises with their value system under pressure of circumstances.
The started decrease in the levels of the index, characteristic of the start of the monitored period, has stopped, but the former trend is being retained. The stabilisation of the index around the same level is an indicator of the existence of permanent attitudes towards compromises with one’s own value system. Corrupt behaviour is formed under pressure of everyday circumstances and the manifestations of corruption in everyday life, rather than by the value system of society. This is also evidenced by the significantly higher levels of this index than those of the “admissibility of corruption in principle” index.
Corrupt behavior tends to be sustained by the pressure of circumstances, rather than by the value system of society. This appears to find confirmation in the considerably higher values of this index compared to the index of corruption acceptability in principle.
Figure 2. Susceptibility to corruption

Base: N= 1170
Corruption pressure
This index measures the spread of the attempts of employees in the public sector to directly or indirectly put pressure on citizens for receiving money, gifts or services.
A significant decrease in the levels of the index is being observed for the present period. They have virtually reached some of the lowest levels during the entire monitoring period. This shows that the overt coercion by civil servants continues to be an inconstant variable, which is influenced by accidental factors, rather than by permanent measures for limiting them.
Figure 3. Corruption Pressure

Base: N= 1170
Corruption pressure by professional groups
The monitoring conducted in May 2002, shows a number of insignificant changes compared to previous periods in the assessments of corruption pressure exercised by the different groups of employees in the public sector. The increased corruption pressure by doctors since October 2001 is continuing. In practice, this professional group is turning into a traditional bearer of corruption. Compared to the previous monitoring (January 2002), corruption pressure by some representatives of the judicial system, and by prosecutors and investigators above all, has also increased.
Among the other professional groups, corruption pressure has increased slightly, more significantly among customs officers, and employees in ministries and the judicial system. A slight drop is registered among the police, municipal and tax officials.
Table 2. "If in the course of the past year you have been asked for something in order to have a problem of yours solved, you were asked by:"
|
January 2000 |
April 2000 |
Sept. 2000 |
January 2001 |
October 2001 |
January 2002 |
May 2002 |
|
|
%* |
%* |
%* |
%* |
%* |
%* |
%* |
|
|
Customs officer |
19,8 |
29,1 |
15,8 |
22,7 |
18,4 |
18,55 |
25,5 |
|
Doctor |
20,0 |
18,6 |
22,1 |
6,1 |
22,3 |
17,96 |
20,2 |
|
Police officer |
23,4 |
19,5 |
24,0 |
18,9 |
18,5 |
19,9 |
15,2 |
|
University professor or official |
10,1 |
12,6 |
13,9 |
13,2 |
8,8 |
14,29 |
12,0 |
|
Administrative staff from the judicial system |
18,5 |
10,4 |
11,5 |
13,3 |
11,3 |
9,38 |
11,0 |
|
Judge |
6,9 |
7,7 |
9,1 |
5,8 |
6,8 |
7,8 |
10,7 |
|
Businessman |
13,7 |
11,9 |
9,7 |
11,6 |
13,4 |
10,77 |
9,4 |
|
Ministry official |
3,2 |
3,7 |
7,0 |
8,9 |
5,6 |
4,92 |
9,3 |
|
Prosecutor |
5,9 |
4,7 |
7,8 |
7,2 |
0,8 |
4,07 |
8,5 |
|
Criminal investigator |
6,1 |
8,4 |
6,0 |
5,5 |
6,0 |
4,27 |
8,2 |
|
Banker |
8,1 |
1,8 |
2,9 |
4,1 |
4,1 |
4,07 |
5,6 |
|
Municipal official |
11,3 |
11,7 |
10,3 |
11,2 |
11,3 |
9,96 |
5,5 |
|
Tax official |
8,4 |
7,8 |
8,3 |
6,4 |
9,1 |
5,29 |
3,8 |
|
Member of Parliament |
1,9 |
4,5 |
6,4 |
4,2 |
2,1 |
2,08 |
3,5 |
|
Teacher |
4,9 |
3,0 |
5,5 |
3,7 |
6,1 |
3,6 |
3,1 |
|
Municipal Council member |
6,7 |
5,6 |
3,2 |
2,1 |
1,4 |
2,05 |
2,7 |
*Relative share of those who have had such contacts, who have been asked for money, gifts, or services
Corrupt practices
This index reflects the level of the personal participation of respondents in different forms of corrupt behaviour, i.e. it reflects the real number of corrupt actions in the last three months.
This is practically the index with the lowest levels compared to all other indices. A decrease to the level of January last year is seen in it at the present stage. The variations in the index at a relatively low level still do not warrant the categorical conclusion that real corrupt actions have been permanently curbed.
Figure 4. Involvement in corrupt practices

Base: N = 1170
ASSESSMENTS OF THE SPREAD OF CORRUPTION
Spread of corruption
It registers citizens’ assessments of the degree of spread of corrupt actions among employees in the public sphere.
The assessments of the degree of spread of corruption for May 2002 mark one of their lowest levels since the start of the corruption monitoring. The drop in the index versus the previous monitored period is nearly 5 points. The reasons for this can, on the one hand, be sought in the genuinely taken actions against corruption and, on the other, in its perception as a permanently existing phenomenon which is becoming a standard in public life.
The so far stable levels of the index, without sharp fluctuations, show that a significant change in public assessments of the degree of spread of corruption in Bulgaria cannot be expected in the near future.
Figure 5. Spread of corruption

Base: N = 1170
Factors influencing the Spread of corruption
The most frequently mentioned reason for the spread of corruption in the country in May 2002 continued to be the desire of the people “clothed” in power to quickly get rich. This moral attitude has a permanent place among the assessments of society as a basic factor breeding corruption.
Noticeably, the influence of the factor “lack of strict administrative control” marks a certain increase compared to the attitudes in January 2002. Conversely, although less noticeably, the assessments of the inefficiency of the judicial system are also changing. Despite some fluctuations, the other factors for the spread of corruption retain an unchanged level.
Table 3. Major factors accounting for the spread of corruption (%)
|
January 2000 |
September 2000 |
January 2001 |
October 2001 |
January 2002 |
May 2002 |
|
|
Fast personal enrichment sought by those in power |
57,0 |
57,8 |
60,8 |
59,2 |
58.6 |
58.6 |
|
Imperfect legislation |
35,1 |
40,5 |
39,1 |
38,0 |
43,0 |
39.7 |
|
Lack of strict administrative control |
30,8 |
32,3 |
31,8 |
35,2 |
34.5 |
38.9 |
|
Low salaries |
47,2 |
41,6 |
33,7 |
32,3 |
38.5 |
36.0 |
|
Ineffectiveness of the judicial system |
24,7 |
22,2 |
27,2 |
28,5 |
32.3 |
31.2 |
|
Intertwinement of official duties and personal interests |
28,3 |
32,6 |
25,8 |
31,7 |
26.7 |
26.9 |
|
Moral crisis in the period of transition |
18,2 |
17,0 |
18,9 |
21,1 |
18.3 |
16.3 |
|
Specific characteristics of Bulgarian national culture |
5,9 |
4,2 |
5,9 |
4,4 |
5.3 |
4.3 |
Base: N = 1170
Spread of corruption by professional groups
No significant changes were observed in the assessment of “professional” spread of corruption among lawyers, businessmen, bankers and teachers for May 2002. According to public opinion, corruption among doctors and the police has increased within the scope of a few months, while it has decreased among most of the other professional groups. Customs officers continue to head the list of the most corrupt professions, despite the slight decrease in the share of respondents who put them at the head of the list.
According to the Bulgarian citizens, corruption is, as a rule, least widespread among the representatives of non-governmental organisations, journalists and teachers. The rating of journalists in this respect has also increased.
Table 4. "According to you, how widespread is corruption among the following groups:"
|
Relative share of responses “Almost everybody or most are involved” |
|||||||
|
|
January 2000 |
April 2000 |
Sept. 2000 |
January 2001 |
October 2001 |
January 2002 |
May 2002 |
|
Customs officers |
77,0 |
78,6 |
75,2 |
74,3 |
77,3 |
74,2 |
70,8 |
|
Lawyers |
54,8 |
51,9 |
52,9 |
50,3 |
55,0 |
55,5 |
52,5 |
|
Doctors |
42,5 |
40,9 |
43,6 |
27,0 |
46,8 |
45,7 |
52,3 |
|
Prosecutors |
46,3 |
54,4 |
51,3 |
50,7 |
54,8 |
55,4 |
51,0 |
|
Judges |
48,5 |
56,0 |
50,1 |
50,6 |
56,4 |
55,0 |
50,8 |
|
Police officers |
51,9 |
50,5 |
54,3 |
51,0 |
53,7 |
47,0 |
50,7 |
|
Criminal investigators |
41,0 |
48,0 |
43,8 |
43,5 |
48,4 |
48,0 |
43,1 |
|
Tax officials |
53,9 |
51,0 |
53,7 |
47,3 |
51,6 |
51,2 |
41,9 |
|
Business people |
48,5 |
51,4 |
42,3 |
43,6 |
42,2 |
41,6 |
41,4 |
|
Members of the Parliament |
45,0 |
55,1 |
51,7 |
52,6 |
43,5 |
47,8 |
39,2 |
|
Ministry officials |
47,9 |
55,1 |
49,7 |
43,9 |
45,8 |
47,1 |
36,7 |
|
Administrative officials in the judicial system |
42,0 |
45,2 |
40,2 |
36,8 |
41,7 |
41,1 |
36,5 |
|
Ministers |
45,3 |
53,4 |
55,0 |
52,3 |
41,2 |
45,4 |
35,6 |
|
Political party and coalition leaders |
37,5 |
45,0 |
43,8 |
39,1 |
40,8 |
43,0 |
33,0 |
|
Municipal officials |
45,0 |
46,5 |
41,6 |
35,9 |
39,6 |
39,4 |
30,0 |
|
University professors or officials |
29,4 |
29,3 |
28,1 |
21,6 |
27,4 |
27,7 |
29,8 |
|
Bankers |
20,9 |
38,8 |
33,5 |
35,6 |
32,5 |
31,7 |
29,5 |
|
Local political leaders |
31,7 |
36,4 |
36,8 |
34,2 |
35,1 |
34,4 |
27,1 |
|
Municipal Council members |
32,5 |
35,2 |
32,1 |
30,9 |
26,3 |
31,8 |
23,4 |
|
Representatives of non-governmental organizations |
16,2 |
18,2 |
23,9 |
18,2 |
19,8 |
21,8 |
15,3 |
|
Teachers |
9,5 |
8,2 |
10,9 |
5,8 |
9,3 |
9,7 |
9,8 |
|
Journalists |
10,6 |
14,1 |
13,9 |
11,3 |
10,5 |
12,2 |
9,5 |
Institutional spread of corruption
Despite the changed method for the registration of data, the internal structure of the state institutions, according to assessments of the degree of spread of corruption in them, has not changed significantly.
According to public opinion, corruption is most widespread in customs, the health system, the judicial system and the Ministry of Interior. In particular, the Privatisation Agency is cited as the most corrupt among the state institutions. The fact is indicative that only 0.1% of the respondents stated that there is no corruption in Bulgaria.
The media maintain a high rating among the population. The majority of respondents consider that corruption does not exist in most of them.
Table 5. Spread of corruption
|
General Spread |
% |
|
Customs |
33,2 |
|
Healthcare system (incl. National Health Insurance Fund) |
25,6 |
|
Parliament, Presidency, Government, political elite. |
24,1 |
|
Court, Judiciary, Justice |
23,5 |
|
In the system of Internal affairs (incl. Traffic police, investigation) |
20,6 |
|
Ministries |
% |
|
Ministry of Health |
16,5 |
|
Ministry of Internal Affairs (incl. The Police and Traffic police) |
16,2 |
|
Ministry of Economy |
16,1 |
|
Ministry of Justice. Court System, Courts |
15,0 |
|
Ministry of Finance (incl. Customs) |
12,6 |
|
Public Institutions |
% |
|
Privatization Agency |
22,0 |
|
Customs |
12,6 |
|
National Health Insurance Fund |
2,5 |
|
Tax Administration |
1,7 |
|
Institutions issuing, licenses and permissions |
1,4 |
|
Judicial System |
% |
|
Court |
29,1 |
|
Prosecution |
26,2 |
|
Investigation |
15,7 |
|
Lawyers, notaries |
15,3 |
|
The whole judicial system. |
3,5 |
|
Bulgarian media |
% |
|
There is no corruption in the Bulgarian media |
9,0 |
|
Print media |
5,6 |
|
Television |
4,4 |
|
Bulgarian National Radio |
3,5 |
|
“Trud” newspaper |
2,3 |
Practical efficiency of corruption
This index shows the assessments of citizens of the degree to which corruption is becoming an effective means of solving personal problems.
The overall decrease of the other corruption indices also influences the levels of the index of practical effectiveness. Since January 2001 there has been a lasting trend of a drop of this index. What this means is that, in the Bulgarian conditions, the solution of private problems by means of corrupt actions is increasingly becoming less effective in practice. This, in turn, warrants the conclusion that positive changes are starting to occur in the social environment which could help to decrease corrupt practices in the future.
Figure 6. Practical efficiency of corruption

Base: N = 1170
This index reflects the assessment of the possibilities (potential) of Bulgarian society to cope with corruption.
The lowest level of this index, registered in October 2001 and compared to the whole monitored period, is slightly compensated by the subsequent increase for the present period.
As a whole, however, the level of the index continues to be high. This shows that the potential of Bulgarian society to cope with the problem of “corruption” is not linked only with the change of mass attitudes to this phenomenon, but also with the appearance of new social practices. New regulatory mechanisms are needed which are at the same time legitimate, morally acceptable and practically effective.
Figure 7. Corruption expectations

Base: N = 1170